Asher gay cake

A gay rights activist has lost a seven-year discrimination dispute over a cake order as the European Court of Human Rights ruled his case inadmissible. Gareth Lee started legal action back in In Gareth Lee, a gay rights activist, placed an order with Ashers Baking Company, a Belfast bakery, [5] for a cake decorated with the slogan "support gay marriage" as same-sex marriage was asher gay cake in Northern Ireland at the asher gay cake.

[6][7] The McArthurs, who are Christians, declined the order and refunded Lee's money, saying they could not. Christian bakers win 'gay cake' Supreme Court fight Daniel and Amy McArthur from Ashers Baking Company told activist Gareth Lee they would not make the cake supporting gay marriage. The cake was ordered four years ago by gay rights activist Gareth Lee The owners of a Northern Ireland bakery found to have discriminated for refusing to make a "gay cake" were forced to act.

Inthe UK Supreme Court ruled Mr Lee was not discriminated against when Ashers bakery refused to make him a cake with the slogan supporting gay marriage. At least in respect of the claim of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, these decisions were problematic for three reasons. Then president of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale, ruled the bakers did not refuse to fulfil the order because of the customer's sexual orientation.

In its decision in the case of Lee v the United Kingdomthe European Court of Human Rights has, by a majority, declared the application inadmissible. In the news See all. Baking a cake with or without a message does not constitute speech in and of itself. Unsurprisingly, the majority judgment has already come in for a fair amount of academic comment on social media. The political reaction. Search for: Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

In a peculiar turn of events after the judgment was delivered, an agency that was hired to take photographs of the owners of the bakery upon their success in the proceedings refused to complete the project and hand over the photographs. The Supreme Court overturned the decision. While the debate leading up to the hearing had been often heated, the BBC's Mark Simpson found that in the courtroom it was a different story, and there was "no heckling, shouting or jeering".

Comment See all.

What happened to the gay cake case

Like Loading Research See all. Last Name. The judge found in favour of Mr Leeexternalsaying that as a business, Ashers was not exempt from discrimination law. Did the owners appeal? I would not presume to predict what the UK Supreme Court will decide, not least because the case turns on the competing claims between two protected characteristics. Even if there had been discrimination on grounds of political opinion, it held that the order should not be read in a way that required the bakery owners to express a message with which they asher gay cake disagreed.

Suggested citation: C. The claim of discrimination on the basis of political belief was somewhat different. Thousands of people attended a rally in protest over the DUP's conscience clause bill. The Court noted that it was clear on the evidence that the bakery discriminated not against the customer, but against the message.

See other recent events and articles. If it did, then by the same logic, the local printing shop could legitimately refuse to print banners bearing messages with which it disagrees. People typically see a sculpture or painting as embodying the message of the sculptor or artist. Thank you for signing up.

Another bakery agreed to accept the order. It held that there had been no less favourable treatment on the grounds of religious belief, since the bakery owners had not refused to serve the applicant because he was gay, but rather because they objected to being required to promote a message with which they profoundly disagreed. Comment Reblog Subscribe Subscribed.

By relying solely on domestic law, the applicant had deprived the domestic courts of the opportunity to address any Convention.